Per site, not per organisation
One average across forty locations hides the three that need attention. Comparison per site is the default view.
Solutions
See which sites actually follow the procedure
Completion, drop-off and adherence per site, shift and role, in one view. Not a monthly export somebody has to assemble by hand.
01The problem
Rollout reporting usually answers the wrong question.
Most training reports tell you how many people completed something. That is a number about your administration, not about your operation. It does not tell you which site is three weeks behind, which module people abandon halfway through, or whether the change you rolled out in spring is actually being applied on the floor.
By the time the real answer surfaces, it surfaces as an audit finding, a customer complaint or an incident. At that point the question is no longer what is happening, but how long it has been happening.
Aristotl reports on execution rather than administration. Per site, per shift and per role: what was completed, where people drop off, and where the same step keeps getting skipped.
Drop-off, not just completion
Where people stop tells you which module is too long, unclear, or written for the wrong audience.
Early enough to act
Gaps show up while there is still time to fix them, instead of during the audit.
02How it works
From activity to insight
- 01
Everything reports itself
Courses, checklists, certifications and messages all feed the same view. There is nothing to assemble by hand.
Read more - 02
Compare where it matters
Site against site, shift against shift, role against role, over the period you choose.
- 03
See where people drop off
Retention per module shows you which content is working and which is being abandoned, and by whom.
- 04
Act on the exceptions
The sites and people that need attention are surfaced, rather than left to be found in a spreadsheet.
Read more
03Related
What analytics connects to
Know who is qualified, before the auditor asks
Who is qualified, what expires when, and which sites are falling behind on renewal.
Digital work instructions and checklists for every site
Completion on the floor, per shift, including the steps that keep getting skipped.
The AI authoring tool that starts from your SOPs
Drop-off data tells you which content to rework, and reworking it takes minutes rather than a project.
See how retail chains and manufacturers use adherence data to find the sites that need help. Retail ChainsManufacturing & Industry
04The platform
Built for frontline reality
- Mobile-firstRuns on any phone. Designed for the floor, not the office.
- Auto translationsEvery course in every language your teams speak, automatically.
- Single sign-onSign in with the identity provider you already use.
- White labelYour logo, your colours, and your own web address.
- Permissions and structureHead office, regions, sites and roles, each with scoped access.
05Questions
Questions we get
Their own site, if that is how you set it up. Head office sees the network, a region sees its region. Access to data follows the same structure as everything else.
Export completion records as CSV. Checklist day logs export as CSV or PDF, including proof, comments, exceptions and corrective actions.
Members sync from your identity provider through SCIM (Microsoft Entra, Okta, Google Workspace). Completion data exports as CSV.
Filter completion by site, group and role, and compare those views over the period you choose.
It is designed around operational adherence, not individual surveillance. What each role can see about individuals is something you configure, and most organisations keep individual detail with the direct manager.
Yes. Completion per person and per site is what most auditors ask for, and it exports as CSV.
Get started
Ask the question you cannot answer today
Which site is behind, who is not qualified, where people stop reading. We will show you where that answer would come from.